Incentivizing High Quality Crowdwork
Chien-Ju Ho, Aleksandrs Slivkins, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Wortman, Vaughan

TL;DR
This paper investigates how performance-based payments influence crowdworker quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk through randomized experiments, identifying when and why PBPs are effective and proposing a new behavioral model.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the conditions under which PBPs improve quality and introduces a novel worker behavior model incorporating subjective beliefs about payment likelihood.
Findings
PBPs improve quality for effort-responsive tasks
Bonus size must be large enough to be salient
All Mechanical Turk payments are implicitly performance-based
Abstract
We study the causal effects of financial incentives on the quality of crowdwork. We focus on performance-based payments (PBPs), bonus payments awarded to workers for producing high quality work. We design and run randomized behavioral experiments on the popular crowdsourcing platform Amazon Mechanical Turk with the goal of understanding when, where, and why PBPs help, identifying properties of the payment, payment structure, and the task itself that make them most effective. We provide examples of tasks for which PBPs do improve quality. For such tasks, the effectiveness of PBPs is not too sensitive to the threshold for quality required to receive the bonus, while the magnitude of the bonus must be large enough to make the reward salient. We also present examples of tasks for which PBPs do not improve quality. Our results suggest that for PBPs to improve quality, the task must be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
