DA white dwarfs from the LSS-GAC survey DR1: the preliminary luminosity and mass functions and formation rate
A. Rebassa-Mansergas, X.-W. Liu, R. Cojocaru, H.-B. Yuan, S. Torres,, E. Garcia-Berro, M.-X. Xiang, Y. Huang, D. Koester, Y. Hou, G. Li, Y. Zhang

TL;DR
This study uses the LSS-GAC survey to derive the luminosity and mass functions of DA white dwarfs, revealing insights into their formation rate and the impact of observational biases, with simulations highlighting the role of mergers in massive white dwarf formation.
Contribution
First, it provides a well-characterized, bias-aware sample of DA white dwarfs from the LSS-GAC survey. Second, it derives preliminary luminosity and mass functions and compares them with population synthesis models, highlighting the role of mergers.
Findings
The space density of DA white dwarfs is approximately 0.83 x 10^{-3} pc^{-3}.
The average formation rate of DA white dwarfs is about 5.42 x 10^{-13} pc^{-3} yr^{-1}.
Simulations reproduce the luminosity function well but underestimate the number of massive white dwarfs.
Abstract
Modern large-scale surveys have allowed the identification of large numbers of white dwarfs. However, these surveys are subject to complicated target selection algorithms, which make it almost impossible to quantify to what extent the observational biases affect the observed populations. The LAMOST (Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope) Spectroscopic Survey of the Galactic anti-center (LSS-GAC) follows a well-defined set of criteria for selecting targets for observations. This advantage over previous surveys has been fully exploited here to identify a small yet well-characterised magnitude-limited sample of hydrogen-rich (DA) white dwarfs. We derive preliminary LSS-GAC DA white dwarf luminosity and mass functions. The space density and average formation rate of DA white dwarfs we derive are 0.83+/-0.16 x 10^{-3} pc^{-3} and 5.42 +/- 0.08 x 10^{-13} pc^{-3} yr^{-1},…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
