The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK): V. A Survey of 41 Planetary Candidates for Exomoons
David M. Kipping, Allan R. Schmitt, Chelsea X. Huang, Guillermo, Torres, David Nesvorny, Lars A. Buchhave, Joel Hartman, G\'asp\'ar \'A. Bakos

TL;DR
This study surveyed 41 Kepler planetary candidates for exomoons using Bayesian photodynamics, finding no confirmed exomoons but providing sensitivity limits and highlighting challenges in detection methods.
Contribution
It significantly expands the sample size for exomoon searches with Bayesian techniques and assesses detection sensitivities and false positive risks.
Findings
No compelling exomoon detections in the surveyed KOIs.
Sensitivity to moons with mass ratios similar to Pluto-Charon in 40% of cases.
Potential to detect Earth-mass moons in 1 out of 3 cases.
Abstract
We present a survey of 41 Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) for exomoons using Bayesian photodynamics, more than tripling the number of KOIs surveyed with this technique. We find no compelling evidence for exomoons although thirteen KOIs yield spurious detections driven by instrumental artifacts, stellar activity and/or perturbations from unseen bodies. Regarding the latter, we find seven KOIs exhibiting >5 sigma evidence of transit timing variations, including the 'mega-Earth' Kepler-10c, likely indicating an additional planet in that system. We exploit the moderately large sample of 57 unique KOIs surveyed to date to infer several useful statistics. For example, although there is a diverse range in sensitivities, we find that we are sensitive to Pluto-Charon mass-ratio systems for ~40% of KOIs studied and Earth-Moon mass-ratios for 1 in 8 cases. In terms of absolute mass, our limits…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
