Standard Model evaluation of $\varepsilon_K$ using lattice QCD inputs for $\hat{B}_K$ and $V_{cb}$
Jon A. Bailey, Yong-Chull Jang, Weonjong Lee, Sungwoo Park (SWME, Collaboration)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the Standard Model prediction of the CP violation parameter $oldsymbol{ ext{epsilon}_K}$ using lattice QCD inputs for $oldsymbol{ ext{B}_K}$ and $oldsymbol{V_{cb}}$, revealing a discrepancy with experiment depending on the $V_{cb}$ determination.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive Standard Model calculation of $ ext{epsilon}_K$ incorporating lattice QCD inputs and compares predictions using exclusive and inclusive $V_{cb}$ values.
Findings
Exclusive $V_{cb}$ leads to a 3.4$\sigma$ deficit in $ ext{epsilon}_K$ prediction.
Inclusive $V_{cb}$ aligns the $ ext{epsilon}_K$ prediction with experimental data.
Calculated $ ext{eta}_{cc}$ at NNLO as $ ext{1.72(27)}$.
Abstract
We report the Standard Model evaluation of the indirect CP violation parameter using inputs determined from lattice QCD: the kaon bag parameter , , from the and decays, and from the axial current form factor for the exclusive decay at zero-recoil. The theoretical expression for is thoroughly reviewed to give an estimate of the size of the neglected corrections, including long distance effects. The Wolfenstein parametrization is adopted for CKM matrix elements which enter through the short distance contribution of the box diagrams. For the central value, we take the Unitarity Triangle apex from the angle-only fit of the UTfit collaboration and use as an independent input to fix…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
