Period, epoch and prediction errors of ephemeris from continuous sets of timing measurements
Hans J. Deeg (1, 2) ((1) Instituto de Astrof\'isica de Canarias (2), Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain)

TL;DR
This paper derives a simple formula for the period error in continuous timing measurements and discusses improved methods for predicting future events, applicable to space-based light curve analyses.
Contribution
It introduces a straightforward formula for period error estimation and proposes better practices for ephemeris epoch referencing in continuous time series.
Findings
Derived a formula for period error: sigma_P = sigma_T (12/(N^3 - N))^0.5
Verified the formula's accuracy through simulations
Recommended central epoch referencing for long, continuous time series
Abstract
Space missions such as Kepler and CoRoT have led to large numbers of eclipse or transit measurements in nearly continuous time series. This paper shows how to obtain the period error in such measurements from a basic linear least-squares fit, and how to correctly derive the timing error in the prediction of future transit or eclipse events. Assuming strict periodicity, a formula for the period error of such time series is derived: sigma_P = sigma_T (12/( N^3-N))^0.5, where sigma_P is the period error; sigma_T the timing error of a single measurement and N the number of measurements. Relative to the iterative method for period error estimation by Mighell & Plavchan (2013), this much simpler formula leads to smaller period errors, whose correctness has been verified through simulations. For the prediction of times of future periodic events, the usual linear ephemeris where epoch errors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
