Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction
Angela Karanjai, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Stephen D. Bartlett, and Terry, Rudolph

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that weak values, typically associated with quantum mechanics, can be understood within a classical framework with an epistemic restriction, providing an operational interpretation and insights into measurement disturbance.
Contribution
It shows that weak values can be derived and interpreted in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction, bridging quantum and classical perspectives.
Findings
Real and imaginary parts of weak values correspond to phase space displacements.
Imaginary part measures postselection bias in phase space distributions.
Biases vanish as measurement disturbance approaches zero.
Abstract
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value: a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in the classical theory. By using this analogous classical theory, we gain insight into the appearance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
