Different Dynamical Ages for the Two Young and Coeval LMC Star Clusters NGC 1805 and NGC 1818 Imprinted on Their Binary Populations
Aaron M. Geller, Richard de Grijs, Chengyuan Li, Jarrod R. Hurley

TL;DR
This study uses N-body simulations to show that two young, coeval LMC star clusters have different binary star radial distributions due to their different dynamical ages, despite similar initial conditions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that initial substructure and dynamical age differences can explain the observed binary frequency trends in NGC 1805 and NGC 1818.
Findings
Both clusters could have started with the same binary properties.
NGC 1805 is dynamically older than NGC 1818.
Binary distributions evolve with dynamical age and mass segregation.
Abstract
The two Large Magellanic Cloud star clusters NGC 1805 and NGC 1818 are approximately the same chronological age (~30 Myr), but show different radial trends in binary frequency. The F-type stars (1.3 - 2.2 MSun) in NGC 1818 have a binary frequency that decreases towards the core, while the binary frequency for stars of similar mass in NGC 1805 is flat with radius, or perhaps bimodal (with a peak in the core). We show here, through detailed N-body modeling, that both clusters could have formed with the same primordial binary frequency and with binary orbital elements and masses drawn from the same distributions (defined from observations of open clusters and the field of our Galaxy). The observed radial trends in binary frequency for both clusters are best matched with models that have initial substructure. Furthermore, both clusters may be evolving along a very similar dynamical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
