Kinematic classifications of local interacting galaxies: implications for the merger/disk classifications at high-z
Chao-Ling Hung (1,2), Jeffrey A. Rich (3,4), Tiantian Yuan (5),, Kirsten L. Larson (1), Caitlin M. Casey (6), Howard A. Smith (2), D. B., Sanders (1), Lisa J. Kewley (5), Christopher C. Hayward (7,8) ((1) IfA, Hawaii, (2) CfA, (3) IPAC, (4) Carnegie, (5) ANU, (6) UC Irvine

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes local galaxy mergers and disks, simulating high-redshift observations to evaluate the reliability of kinematic classifications and highlighting the need for additional morphological indicators.
Contribution
It provides a detailed assessment of how galaxy interaction stages affect kinematic classifications and emphasizes the limitations of current methods at high redshift.
Findings
Mergers with two nuclei and tidal tails have distinct kinematic signatures.
Many interacting disks and merger remnants appear kinematically similar to isolated disks.
Classification accuracy depends on the thresholds used in kinemetry-based methods.
Abstract
The classification of galaxy mergers and isolated disks is key for understanding the relative importance of galaxy interactions and secular evolution during the assembly of galaxies. The kinematic properties of galaxies as traced by emission lines have been used to suggest the existence of a significant population of high-z star-forming galaxies consistent with isolated rotating disks. However, recent studies have cautioned that post-coalescence mergers may also display disk-like kinematics. To further investigate the robustness of merger/disk classifications based on kinematic properties, we carry out a systematic classification of 24 local (U)LIRGs spanning a range of galaxy morphologies: from isolated spiral galaxies, ongoing interacting systems, to fully merged remnants. We artificially redshift the WiFeS observations of these local (U)LIRGs to z=1.5 to make a realistic comparison…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
