Design and Tests of 500kW RF Windows for the ITER LHCD System
Julien Hillairet (IRFM), J Kim, N Faure, J Achard (IRFM), L Delpech, (IRFM), M Goniche (IRFM), S Larroque (IRFM), R Magne (IRFM), L Marfisi, (IRFM), S Park, S Poli (IRFM), N Dechambre, K Vulliez (IRFM)

TL;DR
This paper reports on the design, manufacturing, and high-power testing of 500kW RF windows for the ITER LHCD system, highlighting challenges with ceramic properties and thermal performance during high-power RF pulses.
Contribution
It introduces a new 5 GHz RF window design for ITER LHCD, with detailed testing results and analysis of unexpected high power losses and ceramic property discrepancies.
Findings
Low power measurements showed excellent return and insertion losses.
High power tests revealed unexpected total power loss and high ceramic temperatures.
Post-mortem analysis explained discrepancies due to ceramic property variations.
Abstract
In the frame of a R\&D effort conducted by CEA toward the design and the qualification of a 5 GHz LHCD system for the ITER tokamak, two 5 GHz 500 kW/5 s windows have been designed, manufactured and tested at high power in collaboration with the National Fusion Research Institute (NFRI). The window design rely on a symmetrical pill-box concept with a cylindrical beryllium oxide ceramic brazed on an actively water cooled copper skirt. The ceramic RF properties have been measured on a test sample to get realistic values for guiding the design. Low power measurements of the manufactured windows show return losses below-32 dB and insertion losses between-0.01 dB and-0.05 dB, with an optimum frequency shifted toward lower frequencies. High power tests conducted at NFRI show unexpected total power loss for both windows. The ceramic temperature during RF pulses has been found to reach…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
