Explicit excluded volume of cylindrically symmetric convex bodies
Marco Piastra, Epifanio G. Virga

TL;DR
This paper provides an explicit representation of the excluded volume for cylindrically symmetric convex bodies, revealing the absence of a dipolar component and refining existing analytic estimates for spheroids.
Contribution
It introduces a new method to explicitly compute excluded volume for symmetric convex bodies, correcting previous assumptions about shape dipoles and improving analytic estimates.
Findings
Excluded volume lacks a dipolar component for these bodies.
Method validated on cones and spheroids.
Refines classic analytic estimates for spheroids.
Abstract
We represent explicitly the excluded volume Ve{B1,B2} of two generic cylindrically symmetric, convex rigid bodies, B1 and B2, in terms of a family of shape functionals evaluated separately on B1 and B2. We show that Ve{B1,B2} fails systematically to feature a dipolar component, thus making illusory the assignment of any shape dipole to a tapered body in this class. The method proposed here is applied to cones and validated by a shape-reconstruction algorithm. It is further applied to spheroids (ellipsoids of revolution), for which it shows how some analytic estimates already regarded as classics should indeed be emended.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
