The Optically Unbiased Gamma-Ray Burst Host (TOUGH) Survey. VII. The Host Galaxy Luminosity Function: Probing the Relationship Between GRBs and Star Formation to Redshift $\sim6$
S. Schulze, R. Chapman, J. Hjorth, A. J. Levan, P. Jakobsson, G., Bj\"ornsson, D. A. Perley, T. Kr\"uhler, J. Gorosabel, N. R. Tanvir, A. de, Ugarte Postigo, J. P. U. Fynbo, B. Milvang-Jensen, P. M{\o}ller, D. J. Watson

TL;DR
This study uses the TOUGH survey to analyze the luminosity function of GRB host galaxies up to redshift 6, revealing biases toward low-metallicity hosts and differences from Lyman-break galaxy surveys, thereby informing star formation history.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive constraint on the evolution of the UV GRB host galaxy luminosity function from redshift 0 to 4.5, incorporating metallicity effects and comparing with galaxy surveys and models.
Findings
GRB hosts are biased toward low-metallicity, faint galaxies.
The luminosity function aligns with SFR-weighted models at all redshifts.
A deficit of UV-bright hosts is observed at high redshift, limited by redshift uncertainties.
Abstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) offer a route to characterizing star-forming galaxies and quantifying high- star formation that is distinct from the approach of traditional galaxy surveys: GRB selection is independent of dust and probes even the faintest galaxies that can evade detection in flux-limited surveys. However, the exact relation between the GRB rate and the star formation rate (SFR) throughout all redshifts is controversial. The Optically Unbiased GRB Host (TOUGH) survey includes observations of all GRB hosts (69) in an optically unbiased sample of Swift GRBs and we utilize these to constrain the evolution of the UV GRB-host-galaxy luminosity function (LF) between and , and compare this with LFs derived from both Lyman-break galaxy (LBG) surveys and simulation modeling. At all redshifts we find the GRB hosts to be most consistent with a luminosity function derived…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
