Constraining the radio-loud fraction of quasars at z>5.5
E. Ba\~nados, B.P. Venemans, E. Morganson, J. Hodge, R. Decarli, F., Walter, D. Stern, E. Schlafly, E.P. Farina, J. Greiner, K.C. Chambers, X., Fan, H-W. Rix, W. S. Burgett, P.W. Draper, J. Flewelling, N. Kaiser, N., Metcalfe, J.S.Morgan, J. L. Tonry, R. J. Wainscoat

TL;DR
This study searches for high-redshift quasars at z>5.5 using optical and radio surveys, discovering new radio-loud quasars at z~6 and constraining the radio-loud fraction to be around 8%, with no evidence of evolution over cosmic time.
Contribution
It provides new radio-loud quasar discoveries at z~6 and refines the estimate of the radio-loud fraction at high redshift, highlighting the importance of infrared data for classification.
Findings
Discovered two new radio-loud quasars at z~6.
Nearly doubled the known sample of z~6 radio-loud quasars.
Estimated the radio-loud fraction at z~6 to be about 8%, consistent with no evolution.
Abstract
Radio-loud Active Galactic Nuclei at z~2-4 are typically located in dense environments and their host galaxies are among the most massive systems at those redshifts, providing key insights for galaxy evolution. Finding radio-loud quasars at the highest accessible redshifts (z~6) is important to study their properties and environments at even earlier cosmic time. They would also serve as background sources for radio surveys intended to study the intergalactic medium beyond the epoch of reionization in HI 21 cm absorption. Currently, only five radio-loud () quasars are known at z~6. In this paper we search for 5.5 < z < 7.2 quasars by cross-matching the optical Pan-STARRS1 and radio FIRST surveys. The radio information allows identification of quasars missed by typical color-based selections. While we find no good 6.4 < z <7.2 quasar candidates at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
