Symmetric majority rules
Daniela Bubboloni, Michele Gori

TL;DR
This paper investigates symmetric majority rules within the Arrovian framework, establishing conditions for their existence when preferences and alternatives are partitioned, and providing methods to construct and count such rules.
Contribution
It introduces necessary and sufficient conditions for reversal symmetric majority rules that are anonymous and neutral relative to partitions, expanding the understanding of symmetry in social choice rules.
Findings
Characterization of conditions for symmetric majority rules
A general method for constructing and counting these rules
Explicit applications to specific partition cases
Abstract
In the standard arrovian framework and under the assumption that individual preferences and social outcomes are linear orders on the set of alternatives, we study the rules which satisfy suitable symmetries and obey the majority principle. In particular, supposing that individuals and alternatives are exogenously partitioned into subcommittees and subclasses, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of reversal symmetric majority rules that are anonymous and neutral with respect to the considered partitions. We also determine a general method for constructing and counting those rules and we explicitly apply it to some simple cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · semigroups and automata theory
