Direct Plan Comparison of RapidArc and CyberKnife for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

TL;DR

This study compares RapidArc and CyberKnife for spinal SBRT, showing RapidArc provides better conformity and lower dose spillage, potentially making it a superior treatment option.

Contribution

It is the first direct comparison of RapidArc and CyberKnife plans for spinal SBRT using consistent dose metrics and protocols.

Findings

RapidArc had slightly better conformity index than CyberKnife.

RapidArc plans resulted in approximately 11.6% lower maximum spinal cord dose.

RapidArc demonstrated lower high- and intermediate-dose spillage than CyberKnife.

Abstract

We compared the treatment planning performance of RapidArc (RA) vs. CyberKnife (CK) for spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Ten patients with spinal lesions who had been treated with CK were re-planned with RA, which consisted of two complete arcs. Computed tomography (CT) and volumetric dose data of CK, generated using the Multiplan (Accuray) treatment planning system (TPS) and the Ray-Trace algorithm, were imported to Varian Eclipse TPS in Dicom format, and the data were compared with the RA plan using analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) dose calculation. The optimized dose priorities for both CK and RA plans were similar for all patients. The highest priority was to provide enough dose coverage to the planned target volume (PTV) while limiting the maximum dose to the spinal cord. Plan quality was evaluated with respect to PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), high-dose spillage, intermediate-dose spillage (R50% and D2cm), and maximum dose to the spinal cord, which are criteria recommended by RTOG 0631 spine and 0915 lung SBRT protocols. The mean CI +/- SD values of PTV were 1.11 +/- 0.03 and 1.17 +/- 0.10 for RA and CK (p = 0.02), respectively. On average, the maximum dose delivered to the spinal cord in CK plans was approximately 11.6% higher than in RA plans, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). High-dose spillages were 0.86% and 2.26% for RA and CK (p = 0.203), respectively. Intermediate-dose spillage characterized by D2cm was lower for RA than for CK; however, R50% was not statistically different. Even though both systems can create highly conformal volumetric dose distributions, the current study shows that RA demonstrates lower high- and intermediate-dose spillage than CK. Therefore, RA plans for spinal SBRT may be superior to CK.