Low False-Positive Rate of Kepler Candidates Estimated From A Combination Of Spitzer And Follow-Up Observations
Jean-Michel D\'esert, David Charbonneau, Guillermo Torres, Francois, Fressin, Sarah Ballard, Stephen T. Bryson, Heather A. Knutson, Natalie M., Batalha, William J. Borucki, Timothy M. Brown, Drake Deming, Eric B. Ford,, Jonathan J. Fortney, Ronald L. Gilliland, David W. Latham

TL;DR
This study combines Spitzer and follow-up observations to estimate the false positive rate of Kepler planet candidates, finding it to be low and supporting the reliability of Kepler's planet detections.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale infrared follow-up analysis to independently assess and constrain the false positive rate of Kepler candidates.
Findings
85% of Kepler transit depths are consistent with planetary signals
Spitzer data constrains false positive rate to between 5-40%
Overall false positive rate is estimated to be below 8.8% at 3 sigma confidence
Abstract
(Abridged) NASA's Kepler mission has provided several thousand transiting planet candidates, yet only a small subset have been confirmed as true planets. Therefore, the most fundamental question about these candidates is the fraction of bona fide planets. Estimating the rate of false positives of the overall Kepler sample is necessary to derive the planet occurrence rate. We present the results from two large observational campaigns that were conducted with the Spitzer telescope during the the Kepler mission. These observations are dedicated to estimating the false positive rate (FPR) amongst the Kepler candidates. We select a sub-sample of 51 candidates, spanning wide ranges in stellar, orbital and planetary parameter space, and we observe their transits with Spitzer at 4.5 microns. We use these observations to measures the candidate's transit depths and infrared magnitudes. A…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
