
TL;DR
This paper explores the structure constants of immaculate functions, providing new proofs, properties, and counterexamples related to their algebraic behavior, akin to classical symmetric function theory.
Contribution
It offers a new proof of the Pieri rule, establishes translation invariance, and presents a counterexample to an analogue of the saturation conjecture for immaculate functions.
Findings
New proof of the left Pieri rule for immaculate functions
Translation invariance property of structure coefficients
Counterexample to the analogue of the saturation conjecture
Abstract
The immaculate functions, , were introduced as a Schur-like basis for . We investigate facts about their structure constants. These are analogues of Littlewood-Richardson coefficents. We will give a new proof of the left Pieri rule for the , a translation invariance property for the structure coefficients of the , and a counterexample to an -analogue of the saturation conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
