Electric and Magnetic Dipoles in the Lorentz and Einstein-Laub Formulations of Classical Electrodynamics
Masud Mansuripur

TL;DR
This paper compares the Lorentz and Einstein-Laub formulations of classical electrodynamics, focusing on how they describe electric and magnetic dipoles and their interactions with electromagnetic fields.
Contribution
It clarifies the differences between the Lorentz and Einstein-Laub models in representing dipoles and their force and torque calculations without relying on specific dipole models.
Findings
Maxwell's equations do not require explicit dipole models.
Lorentz formulation models dipoles as charge pairs or current loops.
Einstein-Laub provides direct force and torque calculations on dipoles.
Abstract
The classical theory of electrodynamics cannot explain the existence and structure of electric and magnetic dipoles, yet it incorporates such dipoles into its fundamental equations, simply by postulating their existence and properties, just as it postulates the existence and properties of electric charges and currents. Maxwell's macroscopic equations are mathematically exact and self-consistent differential equations that relate the electromagnetic (EM) field to its sources, namely, electric charge-density , electric current-density , polarization P, and magnetization M. At the level of Maxwell's macroscopic equations, there is no need for models of electric and magnetic dipoles. For example, whether a magnetic dipole is an Amperian current-loop or a Gilbertian pair of north and south magnetic monopoles has no effect on the solution of Maxwell's equations.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
