Estimation after Parameter Selection: Performance Analysis and Estimation Methods
Tirza Routtenberg, Lang Tong

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the impact of parameter selection on estimation accuracy, introduces a performance measure and bounds, and proposes an estimator tailored for post-selection scenarios, validated through various distribution examples.
Contribution
It introduces a post-selection mean squared error criterion, derives a Cramér-Rao-type bound, and develops a post-selection maximum-likelihood estimator with iterative implementation methods.
Findings
The PSML estimator achieves the Cramér-Rao bound under certain conditions.
The proposed bounds and estimators are validated with different distributions.
Post-selection bias significantly affects estimation performance and can be mitigated by the proposed methods.
Abstract
In many practical parameter estimation problems, prescreening and parameter selection are performed prior to estimation. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating a preselected unknown deterministic parameter chosen from a parameter set based on observations according to a predetermined selection rule, . The data-based parameter selection process may impact the subsequent estimation by introducing a selection bias and creating coupling between decoupled parameters. This paper introduces a post-selection mean squared error (PSMSE) criterion as a performance measure. A corresponding Cram\'er-Rao-type bound on the PSMSE of any -unbiased estimator is derived, where the -unbiasedness is in the Lehmann-unbiasedness sense. The post-selection maximum-likelihood (PSML) estimator is presented .It is proved that if there exists an -unbiased estimator that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
