Journal rank in the Science and Technology domain: A lightweight quantitative approach for evaluation

TL;DR

This paper introduces a lightweight, regression-based method for evaluating journal influence that avoids extensive citation data storage, providing a practical alternative to traditional impact metrics.

Contribution

It presents a novel, data-efficient approach for journal ranking that does not require storing large citation datasets, validated against established impact scores.

Findings

The proposed method closely matches SCImago Journal Rank results.

The approach significantly reduces computational overhead.

Validation shows small error margins compared to traditional rankings.

Abstract

The evaluation of journals based on their influence is of interest for numerous reasons. Various methods of computing a score have been proposed for measuring the scientific influence of scholarly journals. Typically the computation of any of these scores involves compiling the citation information pertaining to the journal under consideration. This involves significant overhead since the article citation information of not only the journal under consideration but also that of other journals for the recent few years need to be stored. Our work is motivated by the idea of developing a computationally lightweight approach that does not require any data storage, yet yields a score which is useful for measuring the importance of journals. In this paper, a regression analysis based method is proposed to calculate Journal Influence Score. Proposed model is validated using historical data from the SCImago portal. The results show that the error is small between rankings obtained using the proposed method and the SCImago Journal Rank, thus proving that the proposed approach is a feasible and effective method of calculating scientific impact of journals.