Symmetry: a bridge between nature and culture
Amaury Mouchet (LMPT)

TL;DR
This paper explores the philosophical and scientific significance of symmetry, examining whether symmetries are discovered or invented, and how physics informs this debate about nature and culture.
Contribution
It offers a philosophical analysis of symmetry's role in bridging scientific understanding and cultural interpretation, emphasizing physics' influence on this debate.
Findings
Physics informs the debate on whether symmetries are discovered or invented.
Symmetry serves as a bridge between scientific and cultural perspectives.
The paper highlights the epistemological implications of symmetry in science and philosophy.
Abstract
Are symmetries discovered or rather invented by humans ? The stand you may take firmly here reveals a lot of your epistemological position. Conversely, the arguments you may forge for answering to this question, or to one of its numerous narrower or broader variations, shape your whole philosophical thoughts; not specifically about science, by the way. I will try to show how physics helps to (re)consider this issue.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
