Constraining the Mass and the Non-Radial Drag Coefficient of a Solar Coronal Mass Ejection
C. Kay, L. F. G. dos Santos, and M. Opher

TL;DR
This study uses the ForeCAT model to accurately predict the deflection of a specific CME, constraining its mass and drag coefficient by comparing predictions with observations, thus enhancing understanding of CME dynamics.
Contribution
The paper introduces a method to constrain CME mass and drag coefficient using ForeCAT predictions aligned with observations, focusing on magnetic forces alone.
Findings
CME deflected nearly 30° in latitude and 4.4° in longitude.
Acceptable CME mass range is 4.5x10^14 to 1x10^15 g.
Best fit parameters are a CME mass of 7.5x10^14 g and zero drag coefficient.
Abstract
Decades of observations show that CMEs can deflect from a purely radial trajectory yet no consensus exists as to the cause of these deflections. Many of theories attribute the CME deflection to magnetic forces. We developed ForeCAT (Kay et al. 2013, Kay et al. 2015), a model for CME deflections based solely on magnetic forces, neglecting any reconnection effects. Here we compare ForeCAT predictions to the observed deflection of the 2008 December 12 CME and find that ForeCAT can accurately reproduce the observations. Multiple observations show that this CME deflected nearly 30{\deg} in latitude (Byrne et al. 2010, Gui et al. 2011) and 4.4{\deg} in longitude (Gui et al. 2011). From the observations, we are able to constrain all of the ForeCAT input parameters (initial position, radial propagation speed, and expansion) except the CME mass and the drag coefficient that affects the CME…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
