Evaluation of spatial audio reproduction schemes for application in hearing aid research
Giso Grimm, Stephan Ewert, Volker Hohmann

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different spatial audio reproduction methods and array sizes affect hearing aid algorithm performance, providing guidance for selecting suitable setups in hearing aid research.
Contribution
It systematically compares three spatial audio reproduction methods and their impact on hearing aid algorithm performance, highlighting interaction effects and practical implications.
Findings
Performance varies with reproduction method and array size.
Interaction effects influence algorithm effectiveness.
Guidelines for selecting reproduction setups in hearing aid testing.
Abstract
Loudspeaker-based spatial audio reproduction schemes are increasingly used for evaluating hearing aids in complex acoustic conditions. To further establish the feasibility of this approach, this study investigated the interaction between spatial resolution of different reproduction methods and technical and perceptual hearing aid performance measures using computer simulations. Three spatial audio reproduction methods -- discrete speakers, vector base amplitude panning and higher order ambisonics -- were compared in regular circular loudspeaker arrays with 4 to 72 channels. The influence of reproduction method and array size on performance measures of representative multi-microphone hearing aid algorithm classes with spatially distributed microphones and a representative single channel noise-reduction algorithm was analyzed. Algorithm classes differed in their way of analyzing and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
