Carbon, nitrogen and $\alpha$-element abundances determine the formation sequence of the Galactic thick and thin disks
T. Masseron, G. Gilmore (Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, UK)

TL;DR
This study uses APOGEE data to analyze chemical abundances, revealing that the Galactic thick and thin disks have distinct formation histories, with the thick disk forming earlier and from lower-mass stars, challenging current stellar evolution models.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the formation sequence of the Galactic disks through chemical abundance analysis, highlighting differences in star formation history and challenging existing stellar evolution models.
Findings
Thick disk stars have higher [$ mf ext{C/N}$}] and [$ mf ext{α}$-elements] than thin disk stars at similar metallicities.
The majority of thick disk stars formed earlier than thin disk stars.
Current stellar evolution models cannot reproduce the observed C/N ratios for thick disk stars.
Abstract
Using the DR12 public release of APOGEE data, we show that thin and thick disk separate very well in the space defined by [/Fe], [Fe/H] and [C/N]. Thick disk giants have both higher [C/N] and higher [/Fe] than do thin disk stars with similar [Fe/H]. We deduce that the thick disk is composed of lower mass stars than the thin disk. Considering the fact that at a given metallicity there is a one-to-one relation between stellar mass and age, we are then able to infer the chronology of disk formation. Both the thick and the thin disks - defined by [/Fe] -- converge in their dependance on [C/N] and [C+N/Fe] at [Fe/H]-0.7. We conclude that 1) the majority of thick disk stars formed earlier than did the thin disk stars 2) the formation histories of the thin and thick disks diverged early on, even when the [Fe/H] abundances are similar 3) that the star formation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
