Fixational eye movements: about a binocular slow control mechanism
Marco Rusconi, Stephanie Jainta, Hazel Blythe, Ralf Engbert

TL;DR
This study investigates whether slow drift in fixational eye movements is centrally controlled by analyzing the dependence between horizontal and vertical velocity components, providing evidence for a shared central mechanism.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence supporting the existence of a central control mechanism for both microsaccades and drift in fixational eye movements.
Findings
Binocular dependence in FEM velocity components due to drift
Supports a central generating mechanism for FEM
Helps explain neuronal mechanisms of eye movement control
Abstract
Even when we look at stationary objects, involuntarily our eyes perform miniature movements and do not stand perfectly still. Such fixational eye movements (FEM) can be decomposed into at least two components: rapid microsaccades and slow (physiological) drift. Despite the general agreement that microsaccades have a central generating mechanism, the origin of drift is less clear. A direct approach to investigate whether drift is also centrally controlled or merely represents peripheral uncorrelated oculomotor noise is to quantify the statistical dependence between the velocity components of the FEM. Here we investigate the dependence between horizontal and vertical velocity components across the eyes during a visual fixation task with human observers. The results are compared with computer-generated surrogate time series containing only drift or only microsaccades. Our analyses show a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural dynamics and brain function · Visual perception and processing mechanisms · stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
