Robust and probabilistic optimization of dose schedules in radiotherapy

TL;DR

This paper develops robust and probabilistic optimization methods for radiotherapy dose scheduling that account for patient variability, aiming to improve treatment safety and effectiveness under uncertainty.

Contribution

It introduces two novel approaches—robust and probabilistic—to incorporate inter-patient variability into radiation schedule optimization.

Findings

Optimal schedules with uncertainty considerations often recommend smaller total doses.

Probabilistic models satisfy constraints with specified confidence levels.

Robust solutions tend to have fewer treatment sessions with comparable or reduced doses.

Abstract

We consider the effects of parameter uncertainty on the optimal radiation schedule in the context of the linear-quadratic model. Our interest arises from the observation that if inter-patient variations in OAR and tumor sensitivities to radiation or sparing factor of the OAR are not accounted for during radiation scheduling, the performance of the therapy may be strongly degraded or the OAR may receive a substantially larger dose than the maximum threshold. This paper proposes two radiation scheduling concepts to incorporate inter-patient variability into the scheduling optimization problem. The first approach is a robust formulation that formulates the problem as a conservative model that optimizes the worst case dose scheduling that may occur. The second method is a probabilistic approach, where the model parameters are given by a set of random variables. This formulation insures that our constraints are satisfied with a given probability, and that our objective function achieves a desired level with a stated probability. We used a transformation to reduce the resulting optimization problem to two dimensions. We showed that the optimal solution lies on the boundary of the feasible region and we used a branch and bound algorithm to find the global optimal solution. We observed that if the number of fractions in the optimal conventional schedule is the same as the robust and stochastic solutions, it is preferable to administer equal or smaller total dose. In addition if there exist more (fewer) treatment sessions in the probabilistic or robust solution compared to the conventional schedule, a reduction in total dose squared (total dose) will be expected. Finally, we performed numerical experiments in the setting of head-and-neck tumors to reveal the effect of parameter uncertainty on optimal schedules and to evaluate the sensitivity of the model to the choice of key model parameters.