NEXP-completeness and Universal Hardness Results for Justification Logic
Antonis Achilleos

TL;DR
This paper establishes tight NEXP-completeness bounds and universal hardness results for multi-agent justification logic satisfiability problems, advancing understanding of their computational complexity.
Contribution
It provides the first tight NEXP bounds and broad hardness results for multi-agent justification logics, improving previous single-agent bounds and answering open questions.
Findings
Satisfiability for multi-agent justification logic is NEXP-complete.
Satisfiability is Sigma 2 p-hard under certain conditions.
Results extend previous bounds from single-agent to multi-agent cases.
Abstract
We provide a lower complexity bound for the satisfiability problem of a multi-agent justification logic, establishing that the general NEXP upper bound from our previous work is tight. We then use a simple modification of the corresponding reduction to prove that satisfiability for all multi-agent justification logics from there is hard for the Sigma 2 p class of the second level of the polynomial hierarchy - given certain reasonable conditions. Our methods improve on these required conditions for the same lower bound for the single-agent justification logics, proven by Buss and Kuznets in 2009, thus answering one of their open questions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, programming, and type systems
