Analogy between the cyclotomic trace map $K \rightarrow TC$ and the Grothendieck trace formula via noncommutative geometry
Ilias Amrani

TL;DR
This paper proposes a categorification framework linking the Grothendieck-Lefschetz trace formula with the cyclotomic trace map in algebraic K-theory, using noncommutative geometry to draw deep analogies.
Contribution
It introduces a categorification of schemes and trace formulas, establishing a novel analogy between crystalline cohomology and noncommutative geometry in algebraic K-theory.
Findings
Categorification of schemes to noncommutative schemes.
Analogy between crystalline cohomology and noncommutative geometry.
Potential for categorifying the l-adic cohomology trace formula.
Abstract
In this article, we suggest a categorification procedure in order to capture an analogy between Crystalline Grothendieck-Lefschetz trace formula and the cyclotomic trace map from the algebraic -theory to the topological cyclic homology . First, we categorify the category of schemes to the -category of noncommuatative schemes a la Kontsevich. This gives a categorification of the set of rational points of a scheme. Then, we categorify the Crystalline Grothendieck-Lefschetz trace formula and find an analogue to the Crystalline cohomology in the setting of noncommuative schemes over . Our analogy suggests the existence of a categorification of the -adic cohomology trace formula in the noncommutative setting for . Finally, we write down the corresponding dictionary.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
