Is Bohmian Mechanics an empirically adequate theory?

TL;DR

This paper examines whether Bohmian mechanics can be empirically adequate by addressing criticisms about its predictions in entangled particle measurements, and argues that with proper measurement modeling, its predictions align with standard quantum mechanics.

Contribution

The paper demonstrates that Bohmian mechanics' predictions can match those of standard quantum mechanics when measurement processes are properly modeled, challenging previous criticisms.

Findings

Bohmian mechanics' predictions align with SQM when measurement is correctly modeled.

Criticisms based on local position measurements are addressed and refuted.

No wavefunction collapse is necessary for the equivalence of the theories.

Abstract

Bohmian mechanics (BM) draws a picture of nature, which is completely different from that drawn by standard quantum mechanics (SQM): Particles are at any time at a definite position, and the universe evolves deterministically. Astonishingly, according to a proof by Bohm the empirical predictions of these two very different theories coincide. From the very beginning, BM has faced all kinds of criticism, most of which are either technical or philosophical. There is, however, a criticism first raised by Correggi et al. (2002) and recently strengthened by Kiukas and Werner (2010), which holds that, in spite of Bohm's proof, the predictions of BM do not agree with those of SQM in the case of local position measurements on entangled particles in a stationary state. Hence, given that SQM has been proven to be tremendously successful in the past, BM could most likely not be considered an empirically adequate theory. My aim is to resolve the conflict by showing that 1) it relies on hidden differences in the conceptual thinking, and that 2) the predictions of both theories approximately coincide if the process of measurement is adequately accounted for. My analysis makes no use of any sort of wavefunction collapse, refuting a widespread belief that an "effective collapse" is needed to reconcile BM with the predictions of SQM.