
TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of class-forcing from ZFC models to Morse-Kelley class theory models, providing rigorous definitions and analyzing preservation of axioms, while also showing limitations of Laver's Theorem in this context.
Contribution
It introduces a formal framework for class-forcing in Morse-Kelley models and proves key lemmas without restrictions, highlighting differences from ZFC-based forcing.
Findings
Definability and Truth Lemmas hold without restrictions
Axioms are preserved under certain conditions
Laver's Theorem does not hold for class-forcing in this setting
Abstract
In this article we adapt the existing account of class-forcing over a ZFC model to a model of Morse-Kelley class theory. We give a rigorous definition of class-forcing in such a model and show that the Definability Lemma (and the Truth Lemma) can be proven without restricting the notion of forcing. Furthermore we show under which conditions the axioms are preserved. We conclude by proving that Laver's Theorem does not hold for class-forcings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
