Problems on neat embeddings solved by rainbow constructions and Monk algebras
Tarek Sayed Ahmed

TL;DR
This paper surveys recent advances in algebraic logic, focusing on cylindric algebras, using rainbow and Monk-like constructions to address problems related to neat embeddings, non-atom-canonicity, and axiomatizability.
Contribution
It introduces new methods using rainbow constructions to solve longstanding problems in algebraic logic, including generalizations of Hodkinson, Hirsch, and Hodkinson's results.
Findings
Rainbow constructions solve problems on neat embeddings.
Non-atom-canonicity shown for many varieties of algebras.
Finite variable axiomatizations are impossible for certain classes.
Abstract
This paper is a survey of recent results and methods in (Tarskian) algebraic logic. We focus on cylindric algebras. Fix 2<n<\omega. Rainbow constructions are used to solve problems on classes consisting of algebras having a neat embedding property substantially generalizing seminal results of Hodkinson as well as Hirsch and Hodkinson on atom-canonicity and complete representations, respectively. For proving non-atom-canonicity of infinitely many varieties approximating the variety of representable algebras of dimension n, so-called blow up and blur constructions are used. Rainbow constructions are compared to constructions using Monk-like algebras and cases where both constructions work are given. When splitting methods fail. rainbow constructions are used to show that diagonal free varieties of representable diagonal free algebras of finite dimension n, do no admit universal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Polynomial and algebraic computation
