Online Fair Division: analysing a Food Bank problem
Martin Aleksandrov, Haris Aziz, Serge Gaspers, Toby Walsh

TL;DR
This paper examines online fair division mechanisms for a food bank scenario, analyzing their strategic properties and efficiency through axiomatic and competitive analysis.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes simple online mechanisms for fair division in a charity context, focusing on strategy-proofness, envy-freeness, and efficiency measures.
Findings
Mechanisms are evaluated for strategy-proofness and envy-freeness.
Competitive analysis reveals bounds on efficiency loss.
Price of anarchy quantifies the worst-case inefficiency.
Abstract
We study an online model of fair division designed to capture features of a real world charity problem. We consider two simple mechanisms for this model in which agents simply declare what items they like. We analyse several axiomatic properties of these mechanisms like strategy-proofness and envy-freeness. Finally, we perform a competitive analysis and compute the price of anarchy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Game Theory and Applications
