Residual resistance simulation of an air spark gap switch
S.E. Siahlo, V.V. Tikhomirov

TL;DR
This paper presents a numerical simulation of an air spark gap switch using two theoretical models, accurately predicting residual resistance and other parameters, and demonstrating the importance of residual resistance in circuit behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a kinetic model for simulating residual resistance in air spark gaps and validates it against experimental data, highlighting its significance.
Findings
Residual resistance is 0.2 - 0.4 Ohm for the studied circuit.
Including residual resistance improves simulation accuracy.
Without residual resistance, maximal current is overestimated by about 5%.
Abstract
The numerical simulation of an air spark gap has been carried within two theoretical models. The kinetic one [1] allowed us to calculate time dependencies for the residual resistance (0.2 - 0.4 Ohm for our selection of a circuit parameters), the spark gap channel width, the electron number density, the mobility, the conductivity, the ionization degree, the magnetic field in the discharge channel, the channel inductance and the electron drift velocity. Simulating a real circuit and taking into account a spark gap residual resistance demonstrates good agreement of both models with the experimental data, while that without taking into account this resistance overestimates the maximal current in the circuit by approximately 5%.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsed Power Technology Applications · Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
