Does the nontrivially deformed field-antifield formalism exist?
Igor A. Batalin, Peter M. Lavrov

TL;DR
This paper explores the existence of a nontrivially deformed field-antifield BV formalism by reformulating it using a generalized Euler vector field, extending the usual power-counting operator in a gauge-invariant way.
Contribution
It introduces a reformulation of the deformed BV formalism using a general Euler vector field, providing a gauge-fixing mechanism within this new framework.
Findings
Reformulation of the deformed BV formalism using a generalized Euler vector field.
Extension of the power-counting operator in an antisymplectic-invariant manner.
Implementation of gauge-fixing in the deformed formalism.
Abstract
We reformulate the Lagrange deformed field-antifield BV -formalism suggested, in terms of the general Euler vector field generated by the antisymplectic potential. That generalizes, in a natural anticanonically-invariant manner, the usual power-counting operator. We provide for the "usual" gauge-fixing mechanism as applied to the deformed BV -formalism.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
