Interdependent Security with Strategic Agents and Cascades of Infection
Richard J. La

TL;DR
This paper models how strategic agents in networks decide on security investments, insurance, or inaction, analyzing how these choices influence infection cascades and network security efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a population game framework to study strategic security decisions and their impact on infection cascades and network robustness.
Findings
Cascade probability increases with average node degree.
Nash equilibria depend on infection transmission and node degree.
System parameters significantly influence security investment behaviors.
Abstract
We investigate cascades in networks consisting of strategic agents with interdependent security. We assume that the strategic agents have choices between i) investing in protecting themselves, ii) purchasing insurance to transfer (some) risks, and iii) taking no actions. Using a population game model, we study how various system parameters, such as node degrees, infection propagation rate, and the probability with which infected nodes transmit infection to neighbors, affect nodes' choices at Nash equilibria and the resultant price of anarchy/stability. In addition, we examine how the probability that a single infected node can spread the infection to a significant portion of the entire network, called cascade probability, behaves with respect to system parameters. In particular, we demonstrate that, at least for some parameter regimes, the cascade probability increases with the average…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
