Milking the spherical cow: on aspherical dynamics in spherical coordinates
Andrew Pontzen, Justin Read, Romain Teyssier, Fabio Governato, Alessia, Gualandris, Nina Roth, Julien Devriendt

TL;DR
This paper investigates the inaccuracies introduced by assuming spherical symmetry in modeling aspherical galaxy systems, showing that such assumptions can lead to misleading conclusions and proposing more accurate analysis methods.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework to quantify the impact of spherical symmetry assumptions on the dynamics of aspherical systems and highlights the limitations of idealized spherical models.
Findings
Spherical symmetry assumptions can misrepresent phase space density as ergodic.
Imposing isotropic velocity priors improves observational analysis accuracy.
Triaxial dark matter halos approach, but do not reach, the maximally-stable limit.
Abstract
Galaxies and the dark matter halos that host them are not spherically symmetric, yet spherical symmetry is a helpful simplifying approximation for idealised calculations and analysis of observational data. The assumption leads to an exact conservation of angular momentum for every particle, making the dynamics unrealistic. But how much does that inaccuracy matter in practice for analyses of stellar distribution functions, collisionless relaxation, or dark matter core-creation? We provide a general answer to this question for a wide class of aspherical systems; specifically, we consider distribution functions that are "maximally stable", i.e. that do not evolve at first order when external potentials (which arise from baryons, large scale tidal fields or infalling substructure) are applied. We show that a spherically-symmetric analysis of such systems gives rise to the false conclusion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
