Pitfalls in the quantitative analysis of random walks and the mapping of single-molecule dynamics at the cellular scale
Jean-Baptiste Masson, Maxime Dahan, Antoine Triller

TL;DR
This paper discusses common pitfalls in the quantitative analysis of single-molecule trajectories, emphasizing the importance of avoiding biases to accurately infer diffusion, force, and potential fields at cellular scales using Bayesian inference.
Contribution
It highlights potential pitfalls in current single-molecule analysis methods and provides guidance to obtain unbiased, reliable results in cellular-scale studies.
Findings
Identification of key biases in Bayesian inference for single-molecule data
Emphasis on the importance of avoiding analysis pitfalls for accurate field mapping
Guidance on best practices for unbiased single-molecule trajectory analysis
Abstract
In recent years Bayesian Inference has become an efficient tool to analyse single molecule trajectories. Recently, high density single molecule tagging, Langevin Equation modelling and Bayesian Inference [10] have been used to infer diffusion, force and potential fields at the full cell scale. In this short comment, we point out pitfalls [1, 2] to avoid in single molecule analysis in order to get unbiased results and reliable fields at various scales.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
