Reply to "Comment on "Texture Zeros and WB Transformations in the Quark Sector of the Standard Model"
Yithsbey Giraldo

TL;DR
This paper defends the validity of a specific five-zero texture quark mass matrix against critiques, clarifying the role of phases and weak basis transformations in accurately deriving physical CP violation parameters.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the proposed five-zero texture matrix is valid and reproduces physical quantities, emphasizing the importance of phases and weak basis transformations.
Findings
The five-zero texture matrix correctly generates CP violation parameters.
Phases in diagonalizing matrices can be rotated away, having no physical effect.
Weak basis transformations are complete and useful for analyzing textures.
Abstract
We respond to the comments of S. Sharma et al. [Phys. Rev. D 91, 038301 (2015)] on my recent paper, Y. Giraldo [Phys. Rev. D 86, 093021 (2012)]. In their comments, they begin discussing a particular class of five-zero texture non-Fritzsch-like quark mass matrix, which was proposed by me, and questioning its validity. Then, they put in doubt the phases included in the unitary matrices used for diagonalizing the quark mass matrices, from which they claim that the CP violating parameter obtained does not agree with the experimental value. Because of these comments, finally, they recommend being careful while analyzing the implications of Weak Basis transformations on textures. Other minor points are also discussed by them. In the following, I will show that the mentioned five-zero texture non-Fritzsch-like quark mass matrices is completely valid and generates all the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
