A sample of weak blazars at milli-arcsecond resolution
F. Mantovani (1,2), M. Bondi (2), K.-H. Mack (2), W. Alef (1), E. Ros, (1,3,4), and J.A. Zensus (1) ((1) Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie,, Bonn, (2) Istituto di Radioastronomia-INAF, Bologna, (3) Observatorio, Astronomico, Universitat de Valencia

TL;DR
This study used high-resolution radio imaging to analyze a complete sample of weak blazars, revealing their structures, spectral properties, and gamma-ray associations, and comparing them to brighter blazars.
Contribution
First high-resolution imaging of a complete weak blazar sample, providing insights into their structures, spectral indices, and gamma-ray emission correlations.
Findings
39 point-like sources and 48 core-jet structures detected
56 sources identified as blazars, including some associated with gamma-ray emission
Weak blazars are generally weaker gamma-ray emitters than bright blazars
Abstract
We started a follow-up investigation of the Deep X-ray Radio Blazar Survey objects with declination >-10 deg. We undertook a survey with the EVN at 5GHz to make the first images of a complete sample of weak blazars, aiming at a comparison between high- and low-power samples of blazars. All of the 87 sources observed were detected. Point-like sources are found in 39 cases, and 48 show core-jet structure. According to the spectral indices previously obtained, 58 sources show a flat spectral index, and 29 sources show a steep spectrum or a spectrum peaking at a frequency around 1-2 GHz. Adding to the DXRBS objects we observed those already observed with ATCA in the southern sky, we found that 14 blazars and a SSRQ, are associated to gamma-ray emitters. We found that 56 sources can be considered blazars. We also detected 2 flat spectrum NLRGs. About 50% of the blazars associated to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
