Model Choice and Diagnostics for Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Statistics on Street Corners
Adam Loy, Heike Hofmann, Dianne Cook

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified visual inference framework for diagnosing linear mixed-effects models, addressing limitations of traditional methods and simplifying the process for analysts.
Contribution
It proposes a new, generally applicable visual inference approach for diagnosing and selecting LME models, validated through multiple datasets and a large-scale study.
Findings
Effective visual diagnostics for LME models
Improved model selection procedures
Validated methods on diverse datasets
Abstract
The complexity of linear mixed-effects (LME) models means that traditional diagnostics are rendered less effective. This is due to a breakdown of asymptotic results, boundary issues, and visible patterns in residual plots that are introduced by the model fitting process. Some of these issues are well known and adjustments have been proposed. Working with LME models typically requires that the analyst keeps track of all the special circumstances that may arise. In this paper we illustrate a simpler but generally applicable approach to diagnosing LME models. We explain how to use new visual inference methods for these purposes. The approach provides a unified framework for diagnosing LME fits and for model selection. We illustrate the use of this approach on several commonly available data sets. A large-scale Amazon Turk study was used to validate the methods. R code is provided for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData Analysis with R · Data Visualization and Analytics · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
