Bayesian evidence of the post-Planck curvaton
Robert J. Hardwick, Christian T. Byrnes

TL;DR
This paper uses Bayesian model comparison with recent Planck data to evaluate the curvaton scenario's viability, finding it competitive with inflation models and analyzing future measurement impacts on non-Gaussianity constraints.
Contribution
It provides the first Bayesian evidence comparison of the quadratic curvaton model against standard inflation using Planck data, including forecasts for future non-Gaussianity measurements.
Findings
The simplest curvaton scenario is not disfavoured compared to quadratic inflation.
Including joint BICEP/Keck/Planck data, the curvaton becomes favoured.
Current non-Gaussianity constraints are insufficient to significantly impact evidence ratios.
Abstract
We perform a Bayesian model comparison for scenarios within the quadratic curvaton model, determining the degree to which both are disfavoured with respect to the CDM concordance model and single-field quadratic inflation, using the recent \emph{Planck} data release. Despite having three additional model parameters, the simplest curvaton scenario is not disfavoured relative to single-field quadratic inflation, and it becomes favoured against this single-field model when we include the joint BICEP/Keck/\emph{Planck} analysis. In all cases we assume an instantaneous inflaton decay and no surviving isocurvature perturbations. Despite the success of \emph{Planck} reaching its forecast measurement accuracy, we show that the current constraints on local non-Gaussianity are insufficiently precise to have any significant impact on the evidence ratios so far. We also determine the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
