Positivity of the virial coefficients in lattice dimer models and upper bounds on the number of matchings on graphs
P. Butera (Milano-Bicocca Univ., INFN, Milano, Italy), P. Federbush, (Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, USA), M. Pernici (INFN Sez. Milano, Italy)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the positivity of virial coefficients in lattice dimer models, providing evidence and conjectures that these coefficients are always positive, and explores related bounds on the number of matchings in graphs.
Contribution
It establishes the positivity of virial coefficients up to the 20th order in infinite regular lattices and extends the analysis to finite graphs, proposing new bounds and conjectures.
Findings
Virial coefficients are positive through the 20th order in hypercubic lattices.
Numerical tests support the positivity conjecture for finite lattice graphs.
Derived upper bounds on the number of matchings in arbitrary and regular graphs.
Abstract
Using a relation between the virial expansion coefficients of the pressure and the entropy expansion coefficients in the case of the monomer-dimer model on infinite regular lattices, we have shown that, on hypercubic lattices of any dimension, the virial coefficients are positive through the 20th order. We have observed that all virial coefficients so far known for this system are positive also on infinite regular lattices with different structure. We are thus led to conjecture that the virial expansion coefficients are always positive. These considerations can be extended to the study of related bounds on finite graphs generalizing the infinite regular lattices, namely the finite grids and the regular biconnected graphs. The validity of the bounds for , where is the number of configurations of dimers on the graph and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
