Greedy Minimization of Weakly Supermodular Set Functions
Christos Boutsidis, Edo Liberty, Maxim Sviridenko

TL;DR
This paper introduces weak-$eta$-supermodularity for set functions and demonstrates that greedy algorithms with an extension phase can effectively approximate solutions for various machine learning optimization problems under constraints.
Contribution
It defines weak-$eta$-supermodularity and proves that greedy extension strategies yield near-optimal solutions for constrained minimization problems.
Findings
Greedy extension improves approximation guarantees for weakly supermodular functions.
New bicriteria results for k-means, sparse regression, and column subset selection.
Framework applies to multiple machine learning optimization objectives.
Abstract
This paper defines weak--supermodularity for set functions. Many optimization objectives in machine learning and data mining seek to minimize such functions under cardinality constrains. We prove that such problems benefit from a greedy extension phase. Explicitly, let be the optimal set of cardinality that minimizes and let be an initial solution such that . Then, a greedy extension of size yields . As example usages of this framework we give new bicriteria results for -means, sparse regression, and columns subset selection.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
