SN 2009ip at late times - an interacting transient at +2 years
Morgan Fraser, Rubina Kotak, Andrea Pastorello, Anders Jerkstrand,, Stephen J. Smartt, Ting-Wan Chen, Michael Childress, Gerard Gilmore, Cosimo, Inserra, Erkki Kankare, Steve Margheim, Seppo Mattila, Stefano Valenti,, Christopher Ashall, Stefano Benetti, Maria Teresa Botticella

TL;DR
SN 2009ip showed a slow decline in brightness over two years with no clear signs of core-collapse, suggesting ongoing interaction rather than a typical supernova explosion.
Contribution
This study provides detailed photometric and spectroscopic analysis of SN 2009ip at late times, challenging the core-collapse interpretation and highlighting the importance of interaction in its evolution.
Findings
Steady decline in brightness over two years
Absence of broad nebular emission lines typical of core-collapse
Detection of narrow emission lines with no significant infrared excess
Abstract
We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the interacting transient SN 2009ip taken during the 2013 and 2014 observing seasons. We characterise the photometric evolution as a steady and smooth decline in all bands, with a decline rate that is slower than expected for a solely Co-powered supernova at late phases. No further outbursts or eruptions were seen over a two year period from 2012 December until 2014 December. SN 2009ip remains brighter than its historic minimum from pre-discovery images. Spectroscopically, SN 2009ip continues to be dominated by strong, narrow (2000 km~s) emission lines of H, He, Ca, and Fe. While we make tenuous detections of [Fe~{\sc ii}] 7155 and [O~{\sc i}] 6300,6364 lines at the end of 2013 June and the start of 2013 October respectively, we see no strong broad nebular emission lines that could…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
