Incorporating Spontaneous Reporting System Data to Aid Causal Inference in Longitudinal Healthcare Data
Jenna Reps, Uwe Aickelin

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that integrating spontaneous reporting system data with longitudinal healthcare data significantly improves the accuracy of detecting prescription drug side effects, advancing causal inference methods.
Contribution
It introduces a framework that combines spontaneous reporting data with longitudinal data analysis to enhance causal inference in healthcare.
Findings
AUC improved from 0.923 to 0.967 with data integration
Significant performance boost in side effect detection
Framework effectively combines multiple data sources
Abstract
Inferring causality using longitudinal observational databases is challenging due to the passive way the data are collected. The majority of associations found within longitudinal observational data are often non-causal and occur due to confounding. The focus of this paper is to investigate incorporating information from additional databases to complement the longitudinal observational database analysis. We investigate the detection of prescription drug side effects as this is an example of a causal relationship. In previous work a framework was proposed for detecting side effects only using longitudinal data. In this paper we combine a measure of association derived from mining a spontaneous reporting system database to previously proposed analysis that extracts domain expertise features for causal analysis of a UK general practice longitudinal database. The results show that there…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
