A transcendental view on the continuum: Woodin's conditional platonism
Jean Petitot

TL;DR
This paper explores the philosophical and mathematical modeling of the continuum's intuitive, non-constructible nature within set theory, focusing on Woodin's approach and its relation to classical philosophical views.
Contribution
It proposes a framework for understanding the continuum's transcendence using Woodin's set-theoretic methods, bridging philosophical intuition and formal set theory.
Findings
Modeling of the continuum's transcendence within ZFC
Application of Woodin's large cardinal axioms and $oldsymbol{ ext{Ω}}$-logic
Insights into the philosophical implications of set-theoretic continuum
Abstract
One of the main difficulty concerning the nature of the continuum is to do justice, inside the set theoretical Cantorian framework, to the classical conception (from Aristotle to Thom, via Kant, Peirce, Brentano, Husserl and Weyl) according to which the continuum is a non-compositional, cohesive, primitive, and intuitive datum. This paper investigates such possibilities, from G\"{o}del to Woodin, of modelling inside a ZFC-universe the transcendence of the intuitive continuum w.r.t. its symbolic determination. Keywords: constructive universe, continuum, G\"{o}del, forcing, Kant, large cardinals, -logic, projective hierarchy, , Woodin, .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
