Weak lensing reconstructions in 2D & 3D: implications for cluster studies
Adrienne Leonard, Francois Lanusse, Jean-Luc Starck

TL;DR
This study compares 2D and 3D weak lensing mass mapping techniques, showing 3D methods are more effective at detecting galaxy clusters, especially at higher redshifts, and provide unbiased estimates of cluster properties.
Contribution
It demonstrates that 3D weak lensing reconstructions outperform 2D methods in cluster detection efficiency and accuracy, particularly at higher redshifts.
Findings
3D reconstructions detect clusters up to 10 times more effectively at high redshift.
Both methods are effective at low redshift, with comparable quality.
3D methods provide unbiased mass and redshift estimates of clusters.
Abstract
We compare the efficiency with which 2D and 3D weak lensing mass mapping techniques are able to detect clusters of galaxies using two state-of-the-art mass reconstruction techniques: MRLens in 2D and GLIMPSE in 3D. We simulate otherwise-empty cluster fields for 96 different virial mass-redshift combinations spanning the ranges and , and for each generate 1000 realisations of noisy shear data in 2D and 3D. For each field, we then compute the cluster (false) detection rate as the mean number of cluster (false) detections per reconstruction over the sample of 1000 reconstructions. We show that both MRLens and GLIMPSE are effective tools for the detection of clusters from weak lensing measurements, and provide comparable quality reconstructions at low redshift. At high redshift, GLIMPSE…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
