Systematic characterisation of the Herschel SPIRE Fourier Transform Spectrometer
R. Hopwood, E. T. Polehampton, I. Valtchanov, B. M. Swinyard, T., Fulton, N. Lu, N. Marchili, M. H. D. van der Wiel, D. Benielli, P. Imhof,, J.-P. Baluteau, C. Pearson, D. L. Clements, M. J. Griffin, T. L. Lim, G., Makiwa, D. A. Naylor, G. Noble, E. Puga, L. D. Spencer

TL;DR
This paper presents a comprehensive calibration analysis of the Herschel SPIRE FTS, evaluating its performance, repeatability, and sensitivity through systematic observations of various celestial sources.
Contribution
It provides a detailed assessment of the FTS calibration, including pointing corrections and systematic uncertainties, enhancing the instrument's data accuracy.
Findings
Spectral line center positions repeatability <5 km/s
Line flux repeatability better than 6%
Continuum repeatability improved to ~1% after pointing correction
Abstract
A systematic programme of calibration observations was carried out to monitor the performance of the SPIRE FTS instrument on board the Herschel Space Observatory. Observations of planets (including the prime point-source calibrator, Uranus), asteroids, line sources, dark sky, and cross-calibration sources were made in order to monitor repeatability and sensitivity, and to improve FTS calibration. We present a complete analysis of the full set of calibration observations and use them to assess the performance of the FTS. Particular care is taken to understand and separate out the effect of pointing uncertainties, including the position of the internal beam steering mirror for sparse observations in the early part of the mission. The repeatability of spectral line centre positions is <5km/s, for lines with signal-to-noise ratios >40, corresponding to <0.5-2.0% of a resolution element. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
