Post-Newtonian constraints on Lorentz-violating gravity theories with a MOND phenomenology
Matteo Bonetti, Enrico Barausse

TL;DR
This paper investigates Lorentz-violating gravity theories that combine MOND phenomenology with post-Newtonian constraints, identifying parameter regions where the theories are viable and consistent with solar system and pulsar tests.
Contribution
It introduces a class of Lorentz-violating theories that unify MOND behavior with post-Newtonian constraints, analyzing their viability and parameter space.
Findings
Theories can reproduce MOND phenomenology in low accelerations.
Post-Newtonian expansion remains valid in certain parameter regions.
Theories pass solar-system and pulsar gravity tests.
Abstract
We study the post-Newtonian expansion of a class of Lorentz-violating gravity theories that reduce to khronometric theory (i.e. the infrared limit of Horava gravity) in high-acceleration regimes, and reproduce the phenomenology of the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) in the low-acceleration, non-relativistic limit. Like in khronometric theory, Lorentz symmetry is violated in these theories by introducing a dynamical scalar field (the "khronon") whose gradient is enforced to be timelike. As a result, hypersurfaces of constant khronon define a preferred foliation of the spacetime, and the khronon can be thought of as a physical absolute time. The MOND phenomenology arises as a result of the presence, in the action, of terms depending on the acceleration of the congruence orthogonal to the preferred foliation. We find that if the theory is forced to reduce exactly to General Relativity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
