Proof Systems and Models for the First-Order Primal Logic
Alexandra Podgaits

TL;DR
This paper explores the first-order primal infon logic, providing Gentzen-style calculi, semantics, and completeness proofs for two non-equivalent versions, advancing understanding of its foundational properties.
Contribution
It introduces two Gentzen-style calculi for the first-order primal infon logic and establishes their semantics, completeness, and disjunction property, which were previously unstudied.
Findings
Two non-equivalent Gentzen-style calculi are developed.
Completeness results are proven for both semantics.
Disjunction property is established for both logics.
Abstract
We study the first-order primal infon logic. It is the core of the policy language DKAL. We provide Gentzen-style calculi for two versions of this logic that are not equivalent. For both versions we investigate the semantics: one of them is a generalization of the so-called quasi-boolean semantics, the other one is a Krypke-style semantics. We prove the completeness results and the disjunction property for both logics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems · Formal Methods in Verification
