How predictable is technological progress?
J. Doyne Farmer, Francois Lafond

TL;DR
This paper models technological progress as a correlated geometric random walk with drift, enabling accurate forecasts of cost reductions across diverse technologies and quantifying forecast uncertainties.
Contribution
It introduces a universal probabilistic model for technological cost decline, validated on 53 technologies, allowing reliable future forecasts with known error distributions.
Findings
Forecast errors collapse onto a universal distribution across technologies.
The model accurately predicts future costs and outperforming probabilities.
Practical application demonstrated with solar photovoltaic modules.
Abstract
Recently it has become clear that many technologies follow a generalized version of Moore's law, i.e. costs tend to drop exponentially, at different rates that depend on the technology. Here we formulate Moore's law as a correlated geometric random walk with drift, and apply it to historical data on 53 technologies. We derive a closed form expression approximating the distribution of forecast errors as a function of time. Based on hind-casting experiments we show that this works well, making it possible to collapse the forecast errors for many different technologies at different time horizons onto the same universal distribution. This is valuable because it allows us to make forecasts for any given technology with a clear understanding of the quality of the forecasts. As a practical demonstration we make distributional forecasts at different time horizons for solar photovoltaic modules,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
